What can a three-legged dog teach robots about resilience?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Anyone who's ever seen a dog move around on three limbs knows that canines are remarkably resilient creatures. Scientists are now wondering whether such adaptability could likewise be programmed into robots, in the event they experience damage or malfunction far from a repair shop (look no further than NASA's Mars Spirit rover to see why this is important).

Researchers working on the European Union's Locomorph project—from institutions including the University of Zurich, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne—will present their work analyzing three-legged canine compensation strategies Thursday at the Society for Experimental Biology annual meeting in Prague. Formed last year, Locomorph's goal is to advance robotic locomotion and movement through a multidisciplinary approach that takes into account biology, biomechanics, neuroscience, robotics and embodied intelligence.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers examined walking and running techniques in dogs with forelimb or hindlimb amputations, using a treadmill and a set of 10 high-speed infra-red cameras. Reflective markers positioned on the dogs' skin allowed the scientists to follow the movement of separate parts of the body through time, tracing out trajectories. Absent forelimbs proved more complicated for the dogs, requiring the remaining limbs to undergo careful adaptation to co-ordinate with each other. The scientists figure this is due to the uneven distribution of a dog's body weight, which is greater over the front legs.

Future work under the Locomorph project to develop a better understanding of locomotive activity will examine voluntary and involuntary changes to body movement in a wide range of different animals, including humans. Boston Dynamics has already achieved some of this understanding through work on its four-legged Legged Squad Support System (LS3) for the U.S. military, which can maintain balance on ice or when kicked from the side. It's unclear, however, whether the LS3 could continue to serve as a mechanical pack mule if one if its legs were to be lost to an improvised explosive device (IED) in combat.

Both images courtesy of Martin Gross, who is carrying out the research at the University of Jena in Germany

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe