What Happens to Google's Other Social Networking Efforts?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The launch of the Google+ social network casts a shadow over Google's previous efforts in this arena, including Orkut, Wave and Buzz, all of which still have active Web sites. For the most part Google+'s predecessors will coexist alongside the new social network as Google determines what works and what doesn't.

Google launched Orkut in 2004 after a failed bid to buy social-networking pioneer Friendster a year earlier. The site's popularity in the U.S. was quickly surpassed by a wave of interest in the site from young adults in Brazil (where more than half of Orkut users live) and India. One of the site's notable U.S. fans is Dom Sagolla, one of Twitter's first software developers, who at last year's Idea Festival in Louisville, Ky., called out Orkut as a social networking site with potential.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Google is in no hurry to pull the plug on Orkut. "Over time, we’ll determine what makes the most sense in terms of integrating these products," says a company spokesperson who asked not to be identified, adding that Google will continue to invest in the site, which has about 100 million active users worldwide.

Google introduced Wave in May 2009 as a site for merging e-mail, instant messaging, wikis and social networking. By August 2010 the company announced it was abandoning the effort, citing disappointing user adoption. Google has since turned over further development of Wave to the Apache Software Foundation. Google+, however, was developed from "the ground up" and doesn't include any components developed through Wave, the spokesperson says.

The Google Buzz social networking and messaging service launched in February 2010 and was quickly met with controversy over a lack of privacy protections. One of Buzz's key features was its ability to integrate social networking and messaging into Gmail, but this backfired in part because Buzz automatically shared Gmail contact information without first asking users' permission.

Google+ won't have any major impact on Buzz at launch, according to the company. Buzz users will still see a Buzz tab on their Google profile, and Buzz will continue working as it always has. "Over time, we’ll determine what makes the most sense in terms of integrating the products," the spokesperson says.

Image courtesy of Karl Dolenc, via iStockPhoto.com

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe