What makes old beer taste bad? Why, it's the trans-iso-alpha acids, of course

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Beer, for the most part, is not like wine—it does not improve with age. Quite the contrary, in fact. Old beer is a comparatively unpalatable shadow of its former self—skunky in odor, bitter in aftertaste.

So what happens between the brewery and the bottle opener to make long-in-the-tooth beer taste bad? A team of researchers from—where else?—Germany is on the case. A group from the Technical University of Munich and the Bitburger brewing company last month reported a comprehensive analysis of how beer becomes bitter over time in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Beer is supposed to have a pleasant bitterness, thanks to the contribution of hops. But over time some of those bitter compounds degrade into less appealing substances that lend the aged beer a harsh, bitter aftertaste.

With mass spectrometry, the researchers tracked how those hop-derived compounds changed during storage at a variety of temperatures. They found that a family of compounds known as trans-iso-alpha acids underwent significant degradation into nasty, bitter by-products, including a compound called tricyclocohumol. The concentration of tricyclocohumol in pilsner beer, for instance, increased by nearly a factor of four after eight months of accelerated aging in a bottle at 28 degrees Celsius. Pilsner kept in a bottle at roughly room temperature (20 degrees C) for four years had even more tricyclocohumol—nearly six times the initial concentration.

The breakdown of trans-iso-alpha acids is temperature-dependent, meaning that beer ages faster in warm storage conditions, but it also appears to depend on the initial acidity of the beer. The researchers collected samples of 10 different pilsner brands to compare how the beer's pH value affected the aging process. Even though the beers were all comparable in acidity, ranging from pH 4.3 to 4.55, the slight differences had a measurable impact on how much the hop-derived compounds degraded into unwanted bitter compounds. The more acidic beers accumulated more tricyclocohumol during storage.

The key to producing a fresh-tasting beer, then, is to control its pH during the brewing process and to store it in a cool place once it has been bottled. As a consumer, the easiest thing to do is probably just to avoid old beer altogether. Who knows what kind of trans-iso-alpha acid degradation might be going on in those dusty bottles on your grocer's shelf?

Photo credit: © iStockphoto/Alex Gumerov

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe