What Unusually Long-Lived Animals Tell Us about Human Aging

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As I was editing David Stipp's article "A New Path to Longevity" for the January 2012 issue of Scientific American, Stipp told me about some intriguing research into unusually long-lived mammals. Investigators are studying such animals to better understand why the adult human body deteriorates with age and how to intervene in the process.

David examined that research in his 2010 book The Youth Pill: Scientists at the Brink of the Anti-Aging Revolution, and he gives a taste of it here, in an adaptation of one of the chapters. The piece focuses on the longevity secrets of naked mole rats. These odd creatures, which he describes as "grotesque, mouse-sized rodents," can survive more than five times as long as one would expect, based solely on their size.

Why are researchers concerned about animal size when considering longevity? As David explains in the book, larger mammals generally live longer than smaller ones (probably in part because they are better able to fend off predators). For a given mammal's longevity to be considered exceptional, then, it would have to be able to live much longer than is typical for its size. Those extended survivors are of particular interest because they are the animals most likely to have evolved biological mechanisms that slow aging, and that might thus hold clues for retarding human declines. In the case of naked mole rats, unusual levels of insulin in the blood and the activity of molecules known as chaperones seem to be involved.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Figuring out if a species is unusually long-lived for its size is not straightforward, butSteven Austad, of the Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, has developed a measure called the longevity quotient. He divides the greatest recorded longevity for a species by the life span that would be predicted on the basis of the species's average weight. In this scheme, a score of 1 is average; higher numbers reflect unusual longevity whereas fractions represent unusually short life spans. See rankings for selected animals, including the naked mole rat, here.

Naked mole-rats are unusually long-lived animals that are being studied for clues to slowing aging. Courtesy of Ltshears—Trisha M Shears/Wikimedia Commons

More to Explore

A News Path to Longevity [Preview]

Guest Blog by David Stipp: Quest for Anti-Aging Drugs Transitions from Flaky to Mainstream

Naked Mole-Rats Offer Clues to Living Longer

How Long-Lived Is This Mammal? [Slide Show]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe