What's in a Femtosecond of Laser Light? A Map of Electron Energy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Illuminate a piece of metal, such as copper or silver, and the electrons get excited. These excitable particles in turn alter the electromagnetic fields that give rise to many of the properties technologists exploit, such as copper's excellent performance as a conductor of electricity.

Efforts to observe electrons have become easier in recent years, thanks to advances with incredibly short laser pulses, despite the foundational principles of quantum mechanics that hold sway at this scale. Quantum mechanics and its wave functions suggest one can observe an electron's motion but not without introducing uncertainty about its position, for instance, among other facts one might want to ascertain about an electron. And, it's far more common to observe an electron losing energy than to observe one gaining it. But a better understanding of what happens to electrons excited by incoming light might allow for better photovoltaics or better design of electronic systems that employ light, such as some advanced computer chips.

Now, a team of researchers at the California Institute of Technology has observed electrons in action, creating maps that show the energy fields of excited electrons over time on silver and copper surfaces. Using an electron microscope, the scientists focused the beam on a silver nanoparticle with a larger graphene backingfor a femtosecond (one millionth of one billionth of a second, or really, really, *really* short). The energy gain (or loss) is then calculated from the time delay between the pulses of laser light and electrons. The researchers call the technique "ultrafast spectrum imaging," which actually fails to capture in language how fast it is.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The idea is to map where energy is gained and lost in the electrons of a specific elemental compound. Such a map shows the likely position of excited electrons (and even the amount of energy gained) without revealing other properties (thus keeping the finding in line with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle). So, for example, the new research shows that the triangular silver nanoparticle gained the most energy along its left border and lower right hand corner (for reasons of the particle's thickness and edge sizes, which are smaller than the wavelengths of the incoming photons). The ultrafast technique could next allow scientists to see the interactions of molecules, the properties of particles and, ultimately, the inner workings of cells. Not bad for a super short pulse of laser light.

Image: © iStockphoto.com / Tamer Yazici

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe