Why I Hire Scientists, and Why You Should, Too

They they add to your business, regardless of what industry you’re in

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Before my friends and I started ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists, I was a scientist myself. One of the best things about this was that by the time I started hiring, I already knew the benefits of hiring scientists. Scientists are passionate, excel at time management, are comfortable failing, can think critically, and are great at testing and iterating. This is why you’ll always find the Smart Scientist position on our job board.

Our head of people, head of product, most of our product manages and a number of engineers were all scientists before joining ResearchGate. I didn’t hire these people because they were scientists with limited business experience, but I didn’t dismiss them either.

The thing is, the academic job market has been shrinking for years, which now offers other industries an opportunity to tap into a talent pool of amazing, creative and dedicated minds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It would be a mistake to dismiss this opportunity.

Here are five reasons I hire scientists—and why you should too:

SCIENTISTS ARE PASSIONATE

Passion is a big reason that PhDs are capable of focusing on one obscure question for so many years with relatively lowpay. On top of that, for most PhDs there is no promise of a high-paying job, or for that matter, any job, waiting for them at the end their studies. Compare this to MBA or computer science graduates who know that their hard work should pay off once they land a job.

This passion makes scientists the perfect fit for mission-driven businesses. In my experience, scientists, and PhDs especially, are passionate about whatever they apply their intellect to. If they believe in a company’s mission, they will work hard on achieving it for years.

SCIENTISTS INNOVATE

Making an original contribution to human knowledge is one of the few PhD requirements that remains consistent across all countries and scientific fields. To make this contribution, scientists must first master their chosen area and then find a gap in the knowledge (see a nice graphic by Matt Might on the process). Finding this gap requires wicked critical thinking skills. They need to be able to look at the work of previous scholars, some of whom are the best in their fields, and then take their research in a new direction or find things they missed in their analysis.

In our company, we are consistently trying to do things better, which requires that everyone think critically about how we’re currently doing things. Scientists are trained to find areas for improvement and then get to work improving them.

SCIENTISTS MANAGE THEIR TIME WELL

Graduate students work on a hard deadline. Handing in their dissertation on time requires incredible time and project management skills. They’re making sure all their experiments are running properly, teaching and grading, all while simultaneously writing and editing a dissertation. It all has to be planned carefully to avoid delays. 

Graduate students apply this skill to jobs outside of academia, too. When new scientists join ResearchGate, I know they will be able to set ambitious goals for their teams and get everyone working together efficiently.

SCIENTISTS TEST AND ITERATE

Companies like Facebook grew using what’s called the lean startup approach. This requires businesses to start by thinking of some general questions that relate to their business, develop a testable hypothesis or minimum viable product that could address the question, generate data to test it, and then continually experiment and iterate as necessary. The thing is, the lean startup approach is built on the scientific method so who better to apply it than a scientist.

SCIENTISTS ARE COMFORTABLE FAILING

From my experience as a scientist, 99 percent of the work in research never makes it into the final, published article. But this didn’t stop me from coming in tomorrow and trying again. Failing is a big part of the process of testing and iterating. This means that scientists fail a lot. It’s just a part of the job.

In a business setting this ability to fail and carry on is invaluable. We are consistently testing and iterating, so people can’t get too discouraged when something isn’t working as intended. Scientists will just come in tomorrow and try again. ResearchGate is a science-oriented company, so it makes sense that we hire scientists, but you should consider hiring scientists even if yours isn’t. Ten years’ experience working with them in a business setting has proven to me that science and business aren’t so far apart.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe