Why Space Stinks [VIDEO]

Parts of this supposed vast emptiness smell like rotten eggs or gunpowder.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In space, perhaps no one can hear you scream--but they can still smell some awfully funny things. The neighborhoods of comets and our moon, it turns out, are surprisingly odorous. Matt Davenport, associate editor at one of our partner publications, Chemical & Engineering News, explains why in this short video.

The comet-probing Rosetta mission did not actually smell anything when it got close to its target, but its instruments did detect telltale signatures of certain molecules in the gas cloud around the comet. It found ammonia, and the even more pungent hydrogen sulfide. That compound is what makes rotten eggs smell like, well, rotten eggs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Moon dust, too, can smell up space. Astronauts who set foot on the moon reported a smell like gunpowder when they returned to the lunar lander. That is because the dust contains particles with lots of dangling, open bonds. Those bonds stay open in the moon's sparse atmosphere. But when Apollo astronauts tracked them back into their oxygen-rich temporary home, oxygen molecules latched onto these bonds, creating a reaction that smelled as if someone had just fired a gun.

If you have a sensitive nose and plan on booking a trip up, up and away, not to worry. These compounds are only in limited areas, such as those close to Earth. There is plenty of deep, open space where you can breathe free. If you can breathe in space, that is.

Further Reading:

"Four Great Space Scents"

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe