Why Space Stinks [VIDEO]

Parts of this supposed vast emptiness smell like rotten eggs or gunpowder.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In space, perhaps no one can hear you scream--but they can still smell some awfully funny things. The neighborhoods of comets and our moon, it turns out, are surprisingly odorous. Matt Davenport, associate editor at one of our partner publications, Chemical & Engineering News, explains why in this short video.

The comet-probing Rosetta mission did not actually smell anything when it got close to its target, but its instruments did detect telltale signatures of certain molecules in the gas cloud around the comet. It found ammonia, and the even more pungent hydrogen sulfide. That compound is what makes rotten eggs smell like, well, rotten eggs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Moon dust, too, can smell up space. Astronauts who set foot on the moon reported a smell like gunpowder when they returned to the lunar lander. That is because the dust contains particles with lots of dangling, open bonds. Those bonds stay open in the moon's sparse atmosphere. But when Apollo astronauts tracked them back into their oxygen-rich temporary home, oxygen molecules latched onto these bonds, creating a reaction that smelled as if someone had just fired a gun.

If you have a sensitive nose and plan on booking a trip up, up and away, not to worry. These compounds are only in limited areas, such as those close to Earth. There is plenty of deep, open space where you can breathe free. If you can breathe in space, that is.

Further Reading:

"Four Great Space Scents"

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe