WikiLeaks supporters attack Web sites of MasterCard and other opponents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Despite the incarceration of founder Julian Assange, WikiLeaks is not going away quietly. In fact, Web-savvy supporters of the online whistle-blowing operation have gone on the offensive, launching cyber attacks against Web sites of some of the organizations and people perceived to have wronged Assange and his operation.

Mastercard, which earlier this week announced it would not enable payments to WikiLeaks via its credit-card processing systems, has had its Web site rendered inaccessible several times in the past day. Visa made a similar announcement, and its Web site was likewise down Wednesday afternoon. PayPal, which ended its affiliation with WikiLeaks, was up and running as of post time, but cyber security firm PandaLabs reports that ThePayPalBlog.com has experienced 77 interruptions equaling a total downtime of more than eight hours in the past 24 hours.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Attacks on sites connected to WikiLeaks opponents or critics (not counting MasterCard or Visa) have created 256 interruptions of service and a total of 94 hours of downtime in the past day, according to PandaLabs. Other sites recently downed by cyber attacks, according to PandaLabs, include those run by Sen. Joseph Lieberman (outspoken in condemning WikiLeaks's "cablegate" campaign), Sarah Palin (who likened Assange to a terrorist) and Claes Borgstrom (the lawyer representing the two girls who claim Assange sexually assaulted them this the summer). Assange is currently jailed in England and has been denied bail.

A movement calling itself Operation: Payback, a campaign headed by an anonymous group "against major anti-piracy and anti-freedom entities," is taking credit for much of the digital mayhem. Ironically, the Web site anonops.net, which is linked to Operation: Payback's Twitter page, was likewise inaccessible Wednesday afternoon. Operation: Payback has made a name for itself in recent months by launching cyber attacks against organizations opposed to intellectual property piracy, including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). They now obviously have a new cause.

The most recent attacks against organizations opposed to or distancing themselves from WikiLeaks follow last week's attacks against WikiLeaks's own Web site. One attacker took down the site for a 28-hour period on November 30 and December 1, according to PandaLabs security analyst Sean-Paul Correll.

The weapon of choice in these cyber salvos is the distributed denial-of-service attack (DDOS), in which computers are programmed to flood Internet servers for sites with requests for data to the extent that those servers cannot function. These computers are often enlisted by malicious hackers without the knowledge of the computers' owners.

Operation: Payback logo courtesy of Wikipedia.org

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe