Will fast-tracked "green" patents yield useful new technologies or the next generation of frivolous lawsuits?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Patent applications for so-called green technologies will be put on the approval fast track thanks to a new pilot program announced Monday by the U.S. Commerce Department's Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This could mean patent approvals in a year rather than the standard 40-month wait time, giving inventors of alternative fuels, improved carbon capture methods and electric vehicle batteries, to name a few, quicker access to funding so entrepreneurs can create businesses and get these advancements to market sooner, the USPTO said in a press release.

The first 3,000 green technology applications chosen for evaluation during the yearlong Green Technology Pilot Program (pdf) will skip to the front of the line rather than being evaluated along with the rest of the general applications in the order that they are filed (the standard procedure for the USPTO), and the normal $130 application fee will waived. USPTO said it would consider expanding the program beyond December 8, 2010.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Obama administration is hoping to spark a flurry of green technology patent applications with the help of $100 million in stimulus funds earmarked for alternative energy research and development. The U.S. Department of Energy will provide this funding to projects aimed at using microorganisms to harness chemical or electrical energy to convert carbon dioxide into liquid fuels. The agency will provide additional funding to efforts designed to improve the capture of carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants as well as work done to create better electric-vehicle batteries.

However, the USPTO does not plan to hire additional employees for the pilot program, Greenwire reports. This could cause additional problems for a patent review system that has already been widely criticized, including in an April 2 Scientific American article, as "not functioning optimally," with "poor patent quality" at the heart of the matter. Inventors, patent practitioners, the USPTO and the courts each shoulder some responsibility for this chronic condition, the article concludes.

Others see the USPTO's Green Technology Pilot Program specifically as bad news. "One of the biggest problems is that examiners don't have nearly enough time to thoroughly examine a patent to make sure that it's really patentworthy," Techdirt.com said on Wednesday. "We'll end up with more patent thickets, and a huge waste of money on legal battles, rather than actual innovation."

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ Fabio Bustamante

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe