Your MRI is calling: FDA approves first medical iPhone app

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A medical smart phone app that allows doctors to view and assess medical images has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the first time. The program, called Mobile MIM, pops CT, PET, MRI and other scans directly to portable screens with sufficient quality to enable clinical decisions, the agency concluded in its Friday announcement.

More than 1,500 health care-related apps are already available for download—for professionals and the untrained alike. And doctors have been using similar web-based services, such as Epocrates, for more than a decade. But this is the first technology for smart phones and tablets to be formally approved by the agency that regulates medical devices.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"This important mobile technology provides physicians with the ability to immediately view images and make diagnoses without having to be back at the workstation or wait for film," William Maisel, chief scientist in the agency's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said in a prepared statement.

One of the review committee's concerns about the app, which is approved for use on iPhones and iPads, seemed to be the ease of reading the images if light or screen conditions weren't just right. The app developers seem to have allayed the agency's fears by including a subtly shaded shape on the screen to serve as a contrast indicator. "If the physician can identify and tap this portion of the screen, then the lighting conditions are not interfering with the physician's ability to discern subtle differences in contrast," according to the agency's statement.

The FDA's decision to approve the app specifically marks a step toward more hands-on regulation of mobile-based medical technology. With a messy marketplace—where apps range from professional medication dosage recommendations to casual nutrition information—there is not yet a clear tiered framework in which to assess these tools. And as many involved in developing these technologies have pointed out, ruling on an app might not always make sense if the reference data or larger systems behind the apps themselves are not currently regulated.

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/ScottBush

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe