No Shots for the Octopus, Its Immune System Doesn’t Remember

Flu season is almost upon us, so millions of us are already rolling up our sleeves to get the annual shot. This jab is formulated to introduce our immune system to this year’s circulating strains of the virus so that it will remember how to make the specialized antibodies to fend it off the viral [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Flu season is almost upon us, so millions of us are already rolling up our sleeves to get the annual shot. This jab is formulated to introduce our immune system to this year's circulating strains of the virus so that it will remember how to make the specialized antibodies to fend it off the viral particles it might encounter later. Octopuses, as far as we know, don't get the flu. But if they did, they would be out of luck. Because vaccinations are useless for cephalopods; they lack the acquired immunity we depend on for many of our preventive medical treatments.

And it's not like they're living in a germ-free world. "Wild and reared cephalopods are affected by a wide variety of pathogens," wrote the researchers of a paper in the special "Cephalopod Biology" issue of the Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology this month. Bacterial infections, skin ulcers, protozoa and parasites are all known to cause harm to cephalopods. Even small crustaceans are known to become macro-parasites, inhabiting these animals' mantel, skin and gills.

This presents a challenge—and not only in the wild. With octopus aquaculture just getting off the ground and a directive in the European Union that scientists reduce the use of wild-caught animals in research, we will likely need a way to protect against damaging infections among their stock, in much the way that we vaccinate cows, pigs and other animals raised in large operations. In close confines, an affliction could spread rapidly through an octopus population—even if all they share is a water supply—with no way of vaccinating against it. "One of the disadvantages of acquaculture is the increase in the incidence of pathologies produced by bacteria and/or transmissible parasites that could be a serious risk for the production," the authors of the paper noted. Other factors in artificial environments, such as low salinity, seem to further reduce octopuses' immune response to pathogens.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers still know relatively little about these ailments, and much of the study of octopus infections (including papers upon papers dedicated to parasites that live specifically in octopus kidneys) has been with an eye toward taxonomy rather than pathology. Additionally, "current diagnostic techniques are rather limited," the researchers noted. So we're largely still in the dark about these short-lived animals' common afflictions.

The octopus's immune system—what it has of one—relies on innate capabilities alone, limiting its attacks to things that product the signatures of infection. But scientists are still searching for details about how it works: what genes it engages and how it battles recurrent invaders it cannot build lasting immunity against. To that end, the researchers call for an effort to sequence the genomes of these animals to better understand how the immune system responds to various attacks.

In the meantime, better hope those octos stay healthy. Because even our cleverest vaccines wouldn't be able to help these cephalopods.

Illustration courtesy of Ivan Phillipsen

Katherine Harmon Courage is an independent science journalist and contributing editor for Scientific American. She is author of Octopus! The Most Mysterious Creature in the Sea (Current, 2013) and Cultured: How Ancient Foods Feed Our Microbiome (Avery, 2019).

More by Katherine Harmon Courage

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe