Unusual Offshore Octopods: Telescope Octopus Has Totally Tubular Eyes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Big eyes can be a big benefit—allowing an animal to see potential prey and predators coming from a wider field. For the octopus, this is especially important in the open ocean, where knowing what is around—or above or below—you is crucial for survival.

One type of octopus has taken a different approach to wide-angle vision. Rather than huge peepers, the telescope octopus (Amphitretus pelagicus) has positioned its eyes on top of long, moveable stalks. This vantage point presumably gives the A. pelagicus superb peripheral vision.

Scientists don't know much about this rare pelagic octopus. And the evolution of its bizarre optical organs is largely a mystery. The telescope octopus is closely related to the glass octopus (Vitreledonella richardi), which has moderately elongated eyes. But the telescope octopus is the only known octopod to possess such extreme, protruding eyes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Like the glass octopus, the telescope octopus (named for its eye stalks) is largely transparent. It seems to swim with its oblong opaque stomach and eyes aligned vertically, perhaps to reduce its profile that might be seen by predators below.

Its long, gelatinous web extends much of the way down its arms. The arms have sparse white suckers speckled down their length.

These octopuses have been found at a variety of depths—from 150 to 2,000 meters. And it seems to live primarily in tropical and subtropical waters, spending its life swimming in the water column, rather than crawling on the seafloor like most octopus species.

Some researchers have speculated (pdf) that the telescope octopus, the glass octopus and their close gelatinous relatives emerged to live out their full adult lives in an arrested larval-like stage (a phenomenon known as neoteny). Like the larvae and young hatchlings of other octopus species, these octopods stay suspended in the water column and have transparent bodies. As such, they might fill a similar niche to their pelagic cephalopod cousins, glass squid. But, according to DNA analysis (pdf), their closest relatives in the octopus group belong to the Pareledone genus, which live along the cold ocean floors of the Antarctic. The two lines likely split some 33.5 million years ago before more modern ocean currents came into existence. Since then, it seems the telescope octopus hasn't looked back.

Illustration courtesy of Ivan Phillipsen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe