1 Million Americans without Power Due to Heavy Snowfall

Last weekend's storm left one million Americans without power from Arkansas to Massachusetts, but post-Sandy fears were not realized

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Last weekend, a severe winter storm struck the eastern United States and left one million Americans without power. The blackouts spanned from Arkansas to Massachusetts. But, any fears of Sandy-level outages were not realised.

U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Assurance Daily

All told, the blizzard brought more than a foot of snow to at least 14 states, with several places recording record snowfall levels. But, because of advanced warning, utilities were able to prepare for potential power outages. In the end, the number of people impacted was less than one-eighth (11.7%) of those impacted during Hurricane Sandy in 2012.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


U.S. Department of Energy; Jen Christiansen, Scientific American

According to the U.S. DOE, Duke Energy had the most outages of any utility in the area, with nearly 500,000 customers in the Carolinas losing power. According to the DOE’s Energy Assurance Daily, the power was back online for almost everyone affected by the storm by Wednesday afternoon. Conversely, many of those impacted by Sandy were without power for over a week.

The blizzard took out power to PBF Energy’s Delaware City refinery, which accounts for 15% of East Coast's total operable refining capacity. But, this was the only refinery that reported storm-related problems over the weekend. While natural gas demand rose slightly, both prices and supply remained stable.

Photo of Chinatown in DC "Snowzilla 2016" by Matt Popovich (CC0.0)

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe