(A Lack of Good) Electricity Outage Data

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When attempting to evaluate the overall health of the U.S. electric grid, one potentially important metric relates to outages – how often and how long customers are without power. But, data related to disruptions in electricity service are largely unavailable. In fact, many states do not require utilities to report data related to the impact of electricity outages. The end result is a limited dataset that may or may not be useful in identifying needs for investments for grid infrastructure.

On Monday, MIT released the Future of the Electric Grid after a two year study on the current state and future needs of this critical infrastructure. This latest “Future of…” report included a discussion of grid reliability. In this discussion, the reliability metric was introduced and then quickly followed by a discussion of the lack of usable data regarding outages. Specifically, the report’s authors stated that:

“…customers in the U.S. can expect to experience between 1.5 and 2 power interruptions per year and between 2 and 8 hours without power. This is on par with most European countries…”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But, they quickly insert the caveat that:

“Data on outages are neither comprehensive nor consistent, however. Most outages occur within distribution systems, but only 35 U.S. States require utilities to report data on [distribution outages]… it is accordingly impossible to make comprehensive comparisons across space or over time.”

This lack of comprehensive, usable data ties the hands of analysts wishing to provide a data-based evaluation of the current health of the nation’s electric grid. While available resources are certainly valuable, they could provide an inaccurate picture of the grid’s health. And, without an accurate picture, it is difficult to confidently identify where grid investments should be made.

[To download the new MIT report and see video from its launch, visit this website.]

Photo Credit:

  1. Photo of power lines in Florida by timl2k11 and used under this Creative Commons License.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe