Blackouts: anticipating and preventing the one-two punch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


One year ago, 10% of the world’s population found themselves suddenly without power. The root cause of the largest blackout in history was later identified as combination of a tripped line and relay issue – a one-two punch that the region was not prepared to handle. This month, at the IEEE Power and Energy Society Meeting, a team of MIT researchers will present an algorithm that could be used to prevent this type of issue from wreaking havoc in the future.

Developed by MIT Mechanical Engineering Professor Konstantin Turitsyn and graduate student Petr Kaplunovich, this algorithm’s focus is on identifying points in the electric grid where combinations of two events can cause widespread problems. The algorithm can be used to monitor, in real time, events occurring in the grid. It then flags instances where pairs of component failures would likely lead to big problems.

In power systems, these types of failure incidents are referred to as an “N minus 2 contingency” where "N" refers to the total number of components in the system and "2" is the number of failures. In the case of the 2012 India blackout, failure 1 was a tripped line and failure 2 was a failed relay. Independently, these failures would be unlikely to cause wideapread issues. But, combined, these failures caused massive problems.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A primary goal of MIT’s algorithm is to identify these risky combinations in order to give utilities the chance to address risks before they lead to blackouts.

Photo Credit: Photo of night lights in USA by NASA via flikr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe