Blackouts: anticipating and preventing the one-two punch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


One year ago, 10% of the world’s population found themselves suddenly without power. The root cause of the largest blackout in history was later identified as combination of a tripped line and relay issue – a one-two punch that the region was not prepared to handle. This month, at the IEEE Power and Energy Society Meeting, a team of MIT researchers will present an algorithm that could be used to prevent this type of issue from wreaking havoc in the future.

Developed by MIT Mechanical Engineering Professor Konstantin Turitsyn and graduate student Petr Kaplunovich, this algorithm’s focus is on identifying points in the electric grid where combinations of two events can cause widespread problems. The algorithm can be used to monitor, in real time, events occurring in the grid. It then flags instances where pairs of component failures would likely lead to big problems.

In power systems, these types of failure incidents are referred to as an “N minus 2 contingency” where "N" refers to the total number of components in the system and "2" is the number of failures. In the case of the 2012 India blackout, failure 1 was a tripped line and failure 2 was a failed relay. Independently, these failures would be unlikely to cause wideapread issues. But, combined, these failures caused massive problems.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A primary goal of MIT’s algorithm is to identify these risky combinations in order to give utilities the chance to address risks before they lead to blackouts.

Photo Credit: Photo of night lights in USA by NASA via flikr

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe