January 31, 2017

Can We Power the World with Waves? [Podcast]

In a new episode of the BBC World Service’s podcast “CrowdScience,” listener Michael in Kingston, Jamaica, asks the question, “Why can’t we use energy from the waves of the sea to create all the electricity we need?”

By Melissa C. Lott

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

In a new episode of the BBC World Service’s podcast “CrowdScience”, listener Michael in Kingston, Jamaica asks the question “why can’t we use energy from the waves of the sea to create all the electricity we need?”

In order to answer the question, Greg and Jen with the BBC World Service traveled to Cornwall in the west of England to visit one of the world’s leading wave energy test locations and discuss this question with local scientists. In their podcast, Greg and Jen discuss how we produce electricity today and the "practicalities and potential" of wave energy.

According to their investigation and discussions with researchers including Ocean Engineering Professor Deborah Greaves from Plymouth University in the United Kingdom, wave energy has more potential than other forms of marine energy (e.g. tidal power). But, the technology is not as advanced and costs are currently too high to be broadly competitive.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

To hear more about what researchers are doing to better understand the potential of wave energy to provide the world's electricity demand, one can listen to the entire podcast (for free) here.

And, for those who missed them – check out these previous podcasts by CrowdScience on:

Happy listening!

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American