D.C. Sets Renewables Target of 50% by 2032

This summer, the District of Columbia increased and extended its renewable portfolio standard target to 50% by 2032 and doubles the role of solar.

Photo of a barn and wind turbines in rural Illinois.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This summer the District of Columbia expanded and extended its renewable portfolio standard (RPS) target under the Renewable Portfolio Standard Expansion Amendment Act of 2016. This amendment to the original 2004 Act included:

  • an increase in the District’s RPS from 20% by 2020 to a new target of 50% by 2032

  • an increase in the solar-specific target of 2.5% by 2023 to 5% by 2032

Visually, this increase looks like the following graphic prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on the District of Columbia's Renewable Portfolio Standard Expansion Amendment Act of 2016 (DC Act 21-466)

According to the EIA, the District of Columbia has met its overall target each year since 2009 but has often come up short of its solar ambitions.

To date, the District has met its targets using renewable sources located in neighboring states due to a lack of utility-scale renewable electricity generators within its borders. A total of 19 states outside of D.C. have renewable capacity that can be counted toward the District’s RPS targets.

About half of this approved capacity being found in three states - Illinois, Indiana, and Pennsylvania – and is dominated by wind power. 

A total of 29 states and 3 territories in the United States also have Renewable Portfolio Standards according to the DSIRE database at N.C. State University. An additional 8 states and 1 territory have set renewable portfolio goals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe