DOE FY13 Budget Unveiled National Security (Nuclear) on Top

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Today, President Obama unveiled his $3.8 trillion 2013 budget proposal for the federal government. According to Mark Z. Barabak at the LA Times, this budget “is, at its hear, a political document, laying out [the President’s] priorities and, not incidentally, reflecting the strategy he plans to pursue in his reelection bid.”

In the energy sphere, the message was clear – 1) National Security (nuclear), 2) Innovation, 3) Clean Energy

This afternoon, Secretary of Energy Dr. Steve Chu released information specific to the President’s budget request for his Department. With a top line of $27.2 billion (about a 3% increase over last year’s budget), this budget proposal included funding for basic science and research, clean energy, and national security. And, while much of the fanfare surrounding this budget is focused on energy investments, the bottom line reveals that, similar to past years, almost 2/3 of the of the Department of Energy’s funding actually will be spent on nuclear – and we are not talking about power plants.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Out of the $27.2 billion request, 42% ($11.5 billion) is dedicated to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). These funds will be used to not only maintain the nation’s “nuclear deterrence capabilities” but also to reduce international concerns related to nuclear stockpiles (think megatons to megawatts), and providing for the Navy’s nuclear propulsion needs. Within this $11.5 billion is $2.5 billion for the NNSA’s Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation program, an important component in reaching the President's goal of securing the world’s vulnerable nuclear material within four years.

Nuclear Cleanup (environmental and legacy management) represents another $5.8 billion (21%) of the budget.

In comparison, the $770 million that the President requested for nuclear energy (3% of the total budget) – including $60 million for nuclear waste R&D in response to a report by the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future – seems like pocket change.

Also in the budget:

  • $5 billion for basic science research

  • $350 million for ARPA-E

  • $60 million for energy storage

  • $276 million for advanced fossil fuel power systems and CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) technologies

  • $140 million for the existing Energy Innovation Hubs and to establish a new hub that will be focused on grid systems (including the tie between transmission and distribution systems)

The Department of Energy has released an interactive budget online, with links to all of the associated Congressional Justification documentation that is submitted each year with the President’s proposal.

Photo Credit:

1. Photo of President Barack Obama as he delivered remarks to students on the FY 2013 Budget at the Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA), Annandale, Va., campus, Feb. 13, 2012. (Official White House Photo by Lawrence Jackson

2. Graphic of FY13 Department of Energy budget U.S. Department of Energy - Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Office of Budget

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe