Energy Poll Shows Strong Support for More Domestic Energy Production, Less Concern for the Environment

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


AUSTIN, TEXAS – Energy matters to U.S. consumers and it will likely influence their votes this November. These were some of the insights revealed this morning by the Director of the University of Texas at Austin’s Energy Poll, Sheril Kirshenbaum.

According to the poll, almost two-thirds (65%) of energy consumers say that energy is important to them. Further, the majority of survey respondents would be more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who backs expanded domestic natural gas development. Consumers also appeared to support increasing financial incentives for companies engaged in renewable energy and the creation of a (presumably national) renewable portfolio standard.

On the environmental front, the Energy Poll observed a distinct decline in support for environmental protection since the last poll was conducted 6 months ago. In this go-round, when asked to choose between economic growth or environmental protection, more consumers preferred growth. In the last poll, the response was more evenly split. Further, fewer consumers said they are willing to pay much higher prices for energy in order to protect the environment (at 30% compared with 38% last fall).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To read more about the survey and its results, visit UT Energy Poll Director Sheril Kirshenbaum's comments (here), or visit the UT Energy Poll website (here).

Note: The University of Texas at Austin Energy Poll reflects the views of 2,371 Americans surveyed during March 5-16, 2012. The data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample's composition reflects the actual U.S. population.

Photo Credit - UT Energy Poll

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe