September 29, 2011

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Georgia’s New Nuclear Reactors Closer to Approval

Quick update: Two days of testimony wrapped up yesterday concerning the construction and operation of Plant Vogtle’s new commercial nuclear reactors.

By Robynne Boyd

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Quick update: Two days of testimony wrapped up yesterday concerning the construction and operation of Plant Vogtle's new commercial nuclear reactors. This was the first time the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) considered approving both licenses at the same time.

Previously, companies like Southern Company, which is seeking the combined license, would receive construction permits during the project's initial phase. Then, only after construction was complete, would it seek an operating license as evidence of the reactor's safety. But the process has been simplified in hopes of reducing the costs and time associated with building nuclear reactors.

Much of Tuesday and Wednesday's hearing focused on whether Plant Vogtle achieves the criteria for environmental and human safety - issues stark in people's minds due the Fukushima disaster. The NRC will likely decide by early 2012 on whether Southern receives the license. It also needs to approve the final design of the Westing­house AP1000 reactor, two of which are designated to be built at Plant Vogtle in Ga.

You can watch the hearing here.

Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

More by Robynne Boyd

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe