This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
According to a new poll out by Pew of 1,353 Americans, support for the increased use of fracking has declined over the past year with 41% of Americans in favor of the practice and 47% opposed. But wait just one second...
Is it really fair to assess support for fracking given over half of Americans still aren't even familiar with what the terms 'fracking' or 'hydraulic fracturing' mean?
According to the latest wave of the UT Energy Poll among 2,105 Americans, only 44% are familiar with these terms, while 47% are not familiar or have never heard of them. (The additional 9% say they are neither familiar nor unfamiliar).
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Among the 44% of Americans familiar with fracking, (928/2,105) we found 44% support its use in the extraction of fossil fuels and 41% oppose it. This is UP from one year ago when 38% of those familiar with fracking supported its use.
There's more to the story.
So what do the Pew new numbers really tell us?
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
