Hedges: This Week in Low-Tech Solutions for Climate Change

Bushes and shrubs may provide more targeted relief from air pollution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While several news outlets are abuzz with Elon Musk’s ‘Hyperloop’ pipe-dream (pun very intended), moving ever so slightly ahead, there was a little-noticed journal article in Atmospheric Science that at least BBC and a few others to their credit picked up on. It was boring, it was unexciting, and yet it might very well help cut pollution and save lives in cities. I give you this week’s low-tech solution: hedges. Yes, hedges.

Trees are known to suck up CO2 and other pollutants in cities and elsewhere, and planting them is a pretty good idea (though sadly, with climate change, they appear to be less effective). But they are not the only “greening tool” we have in our arsenal. As the journal article points out, hedges are better at soaking up street-level pollution before it rises and disperses. The reason for this is the interface between how our roads and cities are built (e.g. skyscraper ‘canyons’ vs. narrow streets) and relating to the height of hedges vs. trees.

A study published in Atmospheric Environment in 2015 came to similar conclusions, broadly finding that shorter was better for the sake of dispersion. One interesting consequence is that planting trees along the wrong type of street may actually trap pollution, meaning that planting trees might actually do more harm than good. As often, it is not about the tool but the manner in which it is implemented.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A hedge against street-level pollution in Bangkok, Thailand. Credit: Tali Trigg

The implication is that even before pollution starts spreading, we could plant hedges along major arteries in cities, which would protect people walking along them, but could also prevent pollution from spreading in the first place. Not a bad move for consideration by city planners. Adding them would look nicer, and just like bike lanes, hedges can help calm street traffic and make almost anywhere near a road a more pleasant place to, for example, sit and grab a coffee. By providing a natural barrier between roads and people, hedges could even save lives.

Cities across Australia are seeing an increase in costs and deleterious effects from air pollution, and are looking towards ‘green infrastructure’ (including hedges) to mitigate the problem. In Amsterdam, a bamboo wall is being constructed to not only soak up local air pollutants, but also block noise.

It’s no Hyperloop, but it’s a real and cost-effective solution that is and could be further deployed today. Add these solutions up, and we could be making some real headway in the fight against climate change and towards more breathable and less noisy cities.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe