Hedges: This Week in Low-Tech Solutions for Climate Change

Bushes and shrubs may provide more targeted relief from air pollution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While several news outlets are abuzz with Elon Musk’s ‘Hyperloop’ pipe-dream (pun very intended), moving ever so slightly ahead, there was a little-noticed journal article in Atmospheric Science that at least BBC and a few others to their credit picked up on. It was boring, it was unexciting, and yet it might very well help cut pollution and save lives in cities. I give you this week’s low-tech solution: hedges. Yes, hedges.

Trees are known to suck up CO2 and other pollutants in cities and elsewhere, and planting them is a pretty good idea (though sadly, with climate change, they appear to be less effective). But they are not the only “greening tool” we have in our arsenal. As the journal article points out, hedges are better at soaking up street-level pollution before it rises and disperses. The reason for this is the interface between how our roads and cities are built (e.g. skyscraper ‘canyons’ vs. narrow streets) and relating to the height of hedges vs. trees.

A study published in Atmospheric Environment in 2015 came to similar conclusions, broadly finding that shorter was better for the sake of dispersion. One interesting consequence is that planting trees along the wrong type of street may actually trap pollution, meaning that planting trees might actually do more harm than good. As often, it is not about the tool but the manner in which it is implemented.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A hedge against street-level pollution in Bangkok, Thailand. Credit: Tali Trigg

The implication is that even before pollution starts spreading, we could plant hedges along major arteries in cities, which would protect people walking along them, but could also prevent pollution from spreading in the first place. Not a bad move for consideration by city planners. Adding them would look nicer, and just like bike lanes, hedges can help calm street traffic and make almost anywhere near a road a more pleasant place to, for example, sit and grab a coffee. By providing a natural barrier between roads and people, hedges could even save lives.

Cities across Australia are seeing an increase in costs and deleterious effects from air pollution, and are looking towards ‘green infrastructure’ (including hedges) to mitigate the problem. In Amsterdam, a bamboo wall is being constructed to not only soak up local air pollutants, but also block noise.

It’s no Hyperloop, but it’s a real and cost-effective solution that is and could be further deployed today. Add these solutions up, and we could be making some real headway in the fight against climate change and towards more breathable and less noisy cities.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe