How Much Does Carpooling Matter? A Lot

The end of a policy to support carpooling in Jakarta, Indonesia led to an 87 percent increase in evening rush-hour traffic, according to a study published this summer in Science

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The end of a policy to support carpooling in Jakarta, Indonesia led to an 87% increase in evening rush-hour traffic, according to a study published this summer in Science.

Vehicles slowed to a 7 mile (11 kilometer) per hour crawl, showing the profound impact of moving away from carpooling restrictions. During the morning rush-hour, a smaller – but still major – 46% increase in travel times was observed. Furthermore, traffic worsened throughout the city, including on smaller parallel roads that had not previously been restricted and also during periods outside of rush-hour.

Jakarta’s carpooling policy had required that cars using the high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on major roads have a minimum of three passengers during rush-hour periods. This was meant to reduce travel times throughout the city, which is home to more than 30 million people.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But a common practice in the city of hiring “professional passengers” in order to qualify for HOV lane access raised concerns on the benefits of the carpooling policy. According to Rema Hanna, a Professor of South-East Asia Studies at Harvard University and an author on this new study:

"In Indonesia there were professional passengers, called jockeys, who stood right outside the entrance to the HOV areas. So if you were short a passenger you could hire a jockey to be the third passenger, for a little over a dollar. Some people thought that the fact that these jockeys existed made the whole policy moot."

Even in absence of this controversial practice, these types of HOV policies can be controversial, says Hanna:

"The key issue with HOV policies is that they remove existing lanes from use by general traffic … the question is about whether the additional carpooling behavior makes up for the loss in road space."

The high level of controversy is why, in March 2016, the city government announced that it would cancel its carpooling policy in Jakarta within seven days.

Seeing an opportunity to better understand the impact of HOV policies, when hearing this news Hanna and her colleagues jumped onto Google Maps and began collecting data on traffic conditions in Jakarta. According to Hanna:

"Within 48 hours of the policy announcement we were querying data from Google Maps every 10 minutes to check traffic conditions in Jakarta. We included both the main roads affected by the policy change, as well as other roads in the network in order to understand how traffic was changing citywide."

One can access the full research paper here <link>

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe