Indian Railways and Military Go Solar

There's been no shortage recently of big companies going big on solar, nor of middlemen trying to pave the way for bulk buying of solar power, but when the beast that is national procurement gets involved, the ante is upped.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


There’s been no shortage recently of big companies going big on solar, nor of middlemen trying to pave the way for bulk buying of solar power, but when the beast that is national procurement gets involved, the ante is upped.

Entering this mix: India. While Indian solar potential has to date been largely untapped, there are now several forces combining to increase solar power production in India:

  1. India is under pressure to do (or at least be seen to be doing) something ahead of the COP-21.

  2. Indian cities are now starting to take air pollution seriously, or at least the monitoring thereof.

  3. With 25% of the population having no access to electricity, solar power and especially the potential of rural solar electrification, it’s perhaps no wonder the government is looking to solar as a means to solve several issues (energy access, air pollution, climate change mitigation) at once.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With these stars aligned, the Indian government has decided that its railways as well as armed forces buy bulk solar, adding up to 1 GW for Indian Railways in the next five years, and 300 MW for its armed forces by 2019. Compare this to current capacity of solar power at just 3 GW, and you understand the level of ambition that is starting to rev up in India. In fact, Prime Minister Modi recently raised India’s solar ambitions from a 22 GW target in 2022 up to 100 GW, which would conceivably equal 25% of the country’s installed power capacity.

Will these targets translate into reality? And will the increased solar PV equal increased electricity access? Both are questions worth tracking against reality ahead of the upcoming COP21 meeting in Paris later this year.

 

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe