Televisions and their peripheral equipment account for about 6% of total electricity consumption in U.S. homes. But, the average number of televisions in U.S. households is on the decline, according to the DOE’s most recent Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS).
This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
Televisions and “peripheral equipment” - for example, cable boxes, DVRs, and video game consoles - account for about 6% of total electricity consumption in U.S. homes according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). But, the average number of televisions in U.S. households is on the decline, according to the EIA’s most recent Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS).
The RECS Household Survey gathers data from more than 5,600 households in order to provide insights on how energy is used in homes across the country. According to their most recent survey, the percentage of homes without a television rose from 1.3% to 2.6% between 2009 and 2015. Furthermore, the percentage of homes with more than two televisions declined over the same period.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Overall, the ownership of electronic devices varies significantly by age – in particular for televisions and peripheral devices – according to the latest RECS. For example, despite their smaller household sizes, older households have more televisions and desktop computers than younger households.
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
.png?w=1350)
.png?w=1350)
