July 31, 2015

Jeb Bush Says GOP Should Be the Party of Science

Science doesn't belong to Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives - Science belongs to all of us.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

In politics, science is often presented as a partisan special interest. But the thing is, regardless of which party we support, topics like energy, water, food and climate are going to affect everyone. So I am extremely encouraged to read this from Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's at Bloomberg:

I think as conservatives we should embrace innovation, embrace technology, embrace science. It's the source of a lot more solutions than any government-imposed idea and sometimes I sense that we pull back from the embrace of these things. We shouldn't. We're the party that should be the party of discovery, the party of science, the party of innovation and tear down the barriers so that those things can accelerate in our lives to find solutions for all these things.

I couldn't agree more. On climate change, Jeb adds:

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The climate is changing; I don’t think anybody can argue it’s not. Human activity has contributed to it. I think we have a responsibility to adapt to what the possibilities are without destroying our economy, without hollowing out our industrial core.

There's no question that when it comes to science and technology, the GOP hasn't had a great record recently (like earlier this year when Senator Inhofe embarrassed himself with a snowball in the Senate). But in reality, science doesn't belong to Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives - Science belongs to all of us. Only by working together will we find solutions to the 21st centuries most significant challenges.

As executive director of ScienceDebate and as a registered voter, I certainly hope we hear more about science policy from every presidential candidate. And what's clear right now is that Jeb Bush has set a high bar for his party.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American