Jeb Bush Says GOP Should Be the Party of Science

Science doesn't belong to Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives - Science belongs to all of us.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In politics, science is often presented as a partisan special interest. But the thing is, regardless of which party we support, topics like energy, water, food and climate are going to affect everyone. So I am extremely encouraged to read this from Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's at Bloomberg:

I think as conservatives we should embrace innovation, embrace technology, embrace science. It's the source of a lot more solutions than any government-imposed idea and sometimes I sense that we pull back from the embrace of these things. We shouldn't. We're the party that should be the party of discovery, the party of science, the party of innovation and tear down the barriers so that those things can accelerate in our lives to find solutions for all these things. 

I couldn't agree more. On climate change, Jeb adds:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The climate is changing; I don’t think anybody can argue it’s not. Human activity has contributed to it. I think we have a responsibility to adapt to what the possibilities are without destroying our economy, without hollowing out our industrial core.

There's no question that when it comes to science and technology, the GOP hasn't had a great record recently (like earlier this year when Senator Inhofe embarrassed himself with a snowball in the Senate). But in reality, science doesn't belong to Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives - Science belongs to all of us. Only by working together will we find solutions to the 21st centuries most significant challenges.

As executive director of ScienceDebate and as a registered voter, I certainly hope we hear more about science policy from every presidential candidate. And what's clear right now is that Jeb Bush has set a high bar for his party.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe