Natural Gas - Leading Retirements, New Capacity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Over the past decade, the electricity producing fleet of power plants has begun to noticeably shift. While the country's nuclear and coal fleets continue to age, its natural gas power plants are getting younger and leaner. From 2000-2010, natural gas power plants topped the leader board for retirements and additions to the generation fleet. Over this decade, 64% of the power plants that were retired in the United States were natural gas-fired.

But, over the same period of time, natural gas represented 81% of the new power generation capacity additions in the United States. with a spike in new capacity installations in the early part of the decade.

The average age of these recently retired natural gas power plants was 48 years, with the oldest having been built in 1912. And, the majority of these retired plants were simple cycle steam turbines, making them markedly less efficient than their combined-cycle counterparts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


While coal plant retirements were significant over this period, they were smaller in overall magnitude (and much less in terms of relative percentage of generation) compared to natural gas.

Photo credit:

1. All graphics courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe