New Lithium–Oxygen Battery Is Scalable, Cheap and Quite Promising

Researchers have developed a new variation of lithium–oxygen battery chemistry that could overcome previous shortcomings for this promising storage technology

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A new battery chemistry could improve the efficiency and longevity of lithium-air batteries in a way that is “very scalable, cheap and much safer” than its predecessors, according to a paper published this week in Nature Energy.

Lithium-air batteries have the potential to deliver a high energy output relative to weight. But, previous designs have faced significant challenges including high energy losses, quick degradation, and expensive components that make them incompatible with conventional sealed batteries.

According to MIT Professor Ju Li and his co-authors in their new paper, their new nanolithia cathode battery design can overcome all of these challenges.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The key of this new battery is its ability to overcome the 1.2-volt mismatch between input and output voltages in today’s lithium-air batteries. All told these previous designs waste about 30% of electricity in the charging process as heat, which “can actually burn if you charge it too fast” says Professor Li.

In their new battery, Li and his team have reduced this mismatch to 0.24 volts, meaning that only 8% of the electricity is lost as heat. This reduction means higher efficiency, while also addressing many of the safety concerns related to high levels of heat dissipation (i.e. fires).

The reduction in the voltage mismatch is made possible by nanoparticles called “nanolithia”. These small particles contain both lithium and oxygen – a highly unstable combination on its own, but one that is stabilized when embedded within a cobalt oxide matrix as Li and his team have done.

This nanolithia-embedded matrix allows for oxygen to be kept in solid form throughout the charge/discharge process. This is a significant change from conventional lithium-air batteries, where oxygen is taken from the outside air and is allowed to revert back to a gas.

Li and his team – which includes research scientists Akihiro Kushima and Zongyou Yin of MIT, Lu Qi of Peking University, and Khalil Amine and Jun Lu of Argonne National Laboratory - have already completed successful lab tests of this technology and expect to develop a practical prototype within a year.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe