New Nuclear Reactors Approved

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In a historic vote earlier today, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved Southern Company's application to construct the nation's first nuclear reactors in over 30 years.

The license was granted in a 4-1 vote, and permits two new reactors to be built at Georgia Power's Plant Vogtle (about 170 miles east of Atlanta). Plant Vogtle already has two other reactors of an older design.

"This is a momentous occasion for the citizens of the Southeast and for the advancement of our national energy policy," said Southern Company CEO Thomas Fanning in a small conference room at the company's headquarters in Atlanta. Fanning added that the project will set the standard for safety and efficiency.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Not only does the NRC vote serve as one of the first green lights for the nuclear industry in a long while, it also introduces a new reactor design to the U.S. market (four AP1000 reactors are under construction in China). Westinghouse's AP1000 pressurized water reactor utilizes a modular design and passive safety features, such as gravity, to cool its core in the case of a meltdown. The NRC approved this new reactor design in December 2011.

However, not everyone believes the new licenses fully embrace the tragic lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi meltdown – the most notable person being NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, who voted against license approval this morning. Also, nine anti-nuclear groups have said they will challenge the decision in court in the name of environmental and human safety.

Even so, Southern Co. foresees construction continuing as planned, said Fanning. Limited construction for Units 3 and 4 started a number of years ago, and the now approved "combined operating license" allows for their completion, which includes building the containment and reactor cooling systems.

According to Georgia Power Company President Paul Bowers, the $14 billion project will generate approximately 5,000 jobs in Ga., and 25,000 more globally. And if construction goes according to plan, Plant Vogtle Units 3 and 4 will become operational in 2016 and 2017.

Despite the positive and proud nature of the announcement by Southern Company today, certain questions about a nuclear renaissance can only be answered with time. The first is whether the safety issues that plagued the Fukushima Daiichi plant will continue to haunt the industry. The second is whether the new reactors can be built on time and at cost?

More to explore:

Article: Nuclear Reactor Approved in U.S. for First Time Since 1978

 

Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

More by Robynne Boyd

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe