No New Uranium Mines Near Grand Canyon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


By Melissa C. Lott and Robynne Boyd


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The arm wrestling match over job creation and environmental conservation continues.

One example is the recent announcement regarding new uranium mining near the world's most famous gorge. According to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, the U.S. federal government will implement a 20-year ban on new mining claims in areas surrounding the Grand Canyon. In his announcement, Salazar explained that the Grand Canyon's "priceless landscape" deserved protection from uranium mining, to the applause of environmental groups and eco-tourists.

The embargo extends a 2009 interim ban by the Interior Department that's almost expired.

“A withdrawal is the right approach for this priceless American landscape," said Salazar. "People from all over the country and around the world come to visit the Grand Canyon. Numerous American Indian tribes regard this magnificent icon as a sacred place and millions of people in the Colorado River Basin depend on the river for drinking water, irrigation, industrial and environmental use.”

The lands are located in Mohave and Coconino Counties of Northern Arizona and encompass one million acres. The area is already home to about 3,000 mining claims, which will not be impacted by this new ban.

While the Canyon's fragile ecosystem and $3.5 billion tourist industry are now more secure under the moratorium, opposition to the ban, including Arizona Senator John McCain, lament its impact on uranium production and in turn, job creation. In a state suffering from an 8.7% unemployment rate (the nation’s average is 8.5%), the land surrounding the Grand Canyon represents a rich potential job resource. All told, this area holds about 40 percent of the country's uranium, valued to be in the billions of dollars.

Uranium, the primary fuel source for nuclear power plants, could be used to produce fuel for the nation’s more than 100 gigawatt nuclear power plant fleet.

But, to Taylor McKinnon, the public lands campaign director at the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity “…the real economic engine in northern Arizona is not uranium mining. It’s tourism… to jeopardize our economic engine with more toxic uranium is unacceptable.”

Questions exist about the validity of possible uranium contamination to the environment, and more specifically the Colorado River, underscoring the difficult nature of the ensuring both environmental protection and employment. But, for now, caution is the name of the game – and the ban on mining near the world’s most famous gorge will stay in effect.

Photo Credit:

1. Photo of Mohave Point in Grand Canyon by Tony Wasserman and used under this Creative Commons License.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe