North Dakota flared off $1 billion worth of natural gas last year

Energy producers flared off 30% of all produced natural gas in North Dakota due to lack of infrastructure.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


North Dakota is now the country’s second largest producer of oil behind Texas thanks to technologies like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, meaning previously hard-to-reach shale gas and tight oil can be accessed and brought to market.

But the relatively quick ramp-up in production has stressed the nation’s oil and gas infrastructure leading companies with a decision between investing in oil infrastructure (which bring a higher return) and investing in natural gas pipelines and compressor stations. Companies are increasingly trucking oil out on truck or shipping oil via rail lines (like the train that crashed in Quebec this summer).

Natural gas, on the other hand, faces two problems. For some sites, there are no pipelines or compression stations to take the gas from the wellhead to market. Other sites are connected to pipelines, but those are already at capacity and face congestion issues. Faced with this dilemma, energy producers are investing in getting oil to market, which fetches up to 30 times more than natural gas. So rather than laying new pipeline, companies are choosing to flare off natural gas instead.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The result is that between May 2012 and May 2013, North Dakota producers flared off roughly 30 percent of all natural gas coming out of the ground – a loss of $1 billion in fuel and the GHG emissions of adding 1 million cars to the road, according to an analysis by the sustainable development organization Ceres.

The practice of flaring has grown so much in North Dakota that the United States is now one of the top 10 flaring countries (alongside Russia, Nigeria, and Iraq).

North Dakota regulators have set a public goal to reduce flaring to at most 10 percent by an unspecified date. Currently under North Dakota state law, producers are allowed to flare for the first year of a well’s production, and apply for an extension if they can demonstrate that capturing the natural gas is not economically feasible. North Dakota regulators granted ninety-five percent of extension requests over the last two years.

Nationwide, flaring rates are much lower than in North Dakota. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that 1 percent of natural gas is flared, while Texas flares just 0.4 percent of its natural gas.

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe