Priorities for America's New Secretary of Transportation

Can a creaking and inefficient infrastructure system avoid being politicized, or will jobs, clean air, competitiveness and long-term sustainability be left to states and cities to figure out?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In the quagmire of post-election news, there is one underlying topic that keeps cropping up: infrastructure. During his recent and first speech to Congress, President Trump announced that he would send them a $1 trillion infrastructure bill for signature. How this bill is received we will see soon enough, but a related yet concrete measure is the appointment of Elaine Chao as the new Secretary of Transportation. Her appointment along with the focus on infrastructure portends implications that will be felt the next four years. So what then are the priorities for the new Secretary?

The current state-of-the-(transport)nation is in some ways bleak, and in others, moving firmly in the right direction. First the bad news: the oft-quoted infrastructure report card by the American Society of Civil Engineers gives the U.S. a D+, which is fairly abysmal; also noting that $3.6 trillion is required by 2020 to fill the gap. Boston, as one example, despite hoping to host the 2024 Olympics, may no longer have the underlying transport infrastructure required.

The good news? The U.S. has come far in its thinking, from former Transport Secretary Mary Peters (2006-2009) stating that walking and bicycling are not forms of transportation, and therefore merit no spending. In recent years, things progressed under the leadership of Ray LaHood and Anthony Foxx, who put livable communities squarely in the locus of the Department of Transportation. In fact, Elaine Chao has already given support for continuing bipartisan infrastructure financing, including the TIGER grant program.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


While other until-recent-apolitical areas of discussions have become heavily politicized, such as climate change, one can hope that infrastructure and transportation remain common sense priorities. We will soon know, with decisions on critical infrastructure looming large.

What should be the top transport priorities for the new Secretary of Transportation?

Comments welcome below.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe