Rail-to-Trail Revitalization

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Once only visited by graffiti artists and the destitute, defunct train tracks were dingy causeways to be avoided. All this is beginning to change. In cities where open space is limited, expensive and scattered, developers and city planners are increasingly seeing old railroads for their hidden potential – land ripe for redevelopment, greenspace and multi-use planning. It's no different here in Atlanta.

The BeltLine is Atlanta's version of Manhattan's aesthetically exquisite High Line garden. In the mid-1900's, Atlanta had approximately 1,000 trains passing through on a daily basis. In fact, the city's original name was Terminus. The tracks that looped the city were known as the Belt Line, a term that now describes the city's $2.8 billion redevelopment project aimed toward revitalizing the 22-mile corridor of primarily obsolete tracks circumnavigating the downtown area. Yesterday, a small section of the BeltLine was the scenery for my morning walk.

Truth be told, many parts the BeltLine are still no more than a dusty trail winding behind city lots…


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


(Photo courtesy of Christopher T. Martin)

…Or a semi-overgrown railway track.

(Photo courtesy of Christopher T. Martin)

But, when strolling the trail Thursday morning, I couldn't help growing (tentatively) excited by the Atlanta Development Authority's plan.

"The vision is to have a green corridor that varies in width from 60 to 200 feet, that is both a multi-use trail and modern street car or light trail side-by-side," says Ethan Davidson, a spokesman for the Atlanta BeltLine. "The first section of the corridor is now under construction. It's 2.5 miles long and will be complete in early 2012."

(Picture courtesy of Atlanta BeltLine, Inc.)

If all goes according to plan, this huge redevelopment project could help usher in the city's finest hour. It would provide car commuters, cyclists and pedestrians an alternative, and perhaps more pleasant, way to navigate the city. Over the next 20 years, it would also boost the city's greenspace by about 40 percent.

Other cities have similar projects in various stages, including, Seattle's Waterfront, St. Louis' Trestle, Chicago's Bloomingdale Trail, Shellburne Falls' Bridge of Flowers, Jersey City's Harsimus Stem Embankment, and Philadelphia's Reading Viaduct.

Check them out.

 

Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

More by Robynne Boyd

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe