Report: 1.3 Percent of U.S. Fatalities Due to Road Crashes in 2013

Although it is difficult to link excess pollution from the VW #DieselGate to individual deaths, we can quantify other health impacts more easily--specifically, fatalities related to road crashes. According to new analysis from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute, 1.3 percent of fatalities in the U.S. were due to road crashes in 2013

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While it is difficult to link excess pollution from the VW #DieselGate to individual deaths, we can quantify other health impacts more easily - specifically, fatalities related to road crashes.

According to new analysis from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute, 1.3% of fatalities in the United States were due to road crashes in 2013.

All told, that almost 33,000 people died in road crashes across the country in 2013 – or the equivalent of 10.4 fatalities per 100,000 people. This rate was much lower than the equivalent rates for other causes of death including heart disease (193.3), cancer (185.0), and lung disease (47.2).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Figure 1: Fatality rate from all causes per population, 2013

 

Figure 2: Fatality rate from road crashes per population, 2013

According to the report’s authors, the highest rate of fatalities from road crashes was in Montana (22.6). The lowest fatalities rate was seen in the District of Columbia (3.1).

Reference: Sivak, Michael and Brandon Schoettle. Mortality from Road Crashes in the Individual U.S. States: A Comparison with Leading Causes of Death. October 2015 http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2015-28_Abstract_English.pdf

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe