Report: Electric Cars Could Make Us Healthier and Save the U.S. Billions of Dollars

Electric cars could save the U.S. billions of dollars, according to a new report by the American Lung Association in California.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In a new report by the American Lung Association in California, the health cost of air pollution from passenger vehicles topped $24 billion in 2015. And that’s just for 10 states – California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Put another way - over the course of the year, every tank (16-gallons) of gas that was used in our cars added $11.82** to public health bills.

These costs are due to the pollution created through the combustion of fossil fuels – gasoline and diesel – in these vehicles. These costs led to an estimated…


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • 220,000 work-loss days

  • >190,000 asthma exacerbations

  • hundreds of thousands of other respiratory health impacts

  • 2,580 premature deaths

… across the ten states that were the focus of this report. These states were included in the analysis because they have adopted zero emission vehicle sales programs.

According to the American Lung Association’s analysis, these programs could drive these states toward massive health savings. In their “Zero Emission Vehicle Future” scenario, the ALA’s experts estimate that these states could eliminate most (87.5%) of the health costs of air pollution from passenger vehicles.

In this scenario, today’s internal combustion engines were replaced over time by “zero emission vehicles” (ZEVs) including the following vehicle types:

  • battery electric (BEVs)

  • plug-in hybrid electric (PHEVs)

  • hydrogen fuel-cell electric (FCVs)

Furthermore, this scenario was structured so that all new cars sold in 2050 were ZEVs. This adoption rate means that, in practice, 65% of all passenger vehicles on the road in 2050 in the ten states were ZEVs. Of these vehicles, half were plug-in hybrid electric vehicles while the other half were comprised of both battery and fuel-cell electric vehicles.

Overall, California saw the highest health benefit in 2050 while Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont saw the lowest. This result is somewhat unsurprising given the corresponding populations and car demand levels for each state.

One can read the entire report at the following link.

**The American Lung Association in California also estimated the climate costs of passenger vehicles. Including these costs brought the total cost per 16-gallong tank of gasoline to $18.42 (see page 6 of the final ALA report).

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe