Report: Onshore Wind Is "Fully Competitive" Versus Fossil Fuels in Some Parts of the World

Onshore wind power is “fully competitive” with gas and coal in some markets with solar not far behind, according to a report released today by Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Onshore wind power is “fully competitive” with gas and coal in some parts of the world, with solar closing the gap according to a report released today by Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

In BNEF’s latest “Levelised Cost of Electricity Update” for H2 2015, analysts report that the cost of electricity from fossil fuels is increasingly expensive around the world while the cost of renewable power is dropping.

All told, these analysts found that the levelised costs for electricity from gas-fired power plants (CCGT) have 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


risen from:

  • $76 → $82 per Megawatt-hour (MWh) in the Americas

  • $85 → $93 per MWh in Asia-Pacific 

  • $103 → $118 per MWh in the EMEA region

The levelised costs for electricity from coal-fired power plants (CCGT) have 

risen from:

  • $66 → $75 per MWh in the Americas

  • $68 → $73 per MWh in Asia-Pacific, and

  • $82 → $105 per MWh in Europe

The levelised costs for electricity from wind and solar has 

dropped from: 

  • $85 → $83 per MWh (onshore wind) 

  • $176 → $174 per MWh (offshore wind)

  • $129 → $122 per MWh (solar photovoltaics - crystalline silicon)

This means that onshore wind is directly cost-competitive with fossil-fuel generation in many world markets and solar power is closing the gap. The levelised cost of electricity for nuclear power increased in the Americas and EMEA region.

The levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) metric used by BNEF in this analysis represents the cost of building and operating a power plant in terms of actual electricity generation. In this case, its units are dollars per Megawatt-hour ($/MWh). The cost includes that for capital investments, fuel, operation and maintenance (O&M), and financing. These costs are then divided among the total number of Megawatt-hours that are produced by each type of power plant.

Since solar and wind power both have no fuel costs and small O&M costs, their LCOE’s are mainly a function of the capital costs to build and install the wind and solar technology. For coal and gas-fired power plants, the variable fuel and O&M costs are non-zero and so play a bigger role in the final LCOE.

According to BNEF Energy Economics Analyst, Luke Mills:

"Generating costs continue to vary greatly from region to region, reflecting influences such as the shale gas boom in the US, changing utilisation rates in areas of high renewables penetration, the shortage of local gas production in East Asia, carbon prices in Europe, differing regulations on nuclear power across the world, and contrasting resources for solar generation…But onshore wind and solar PV are both now much more competitive against the established generation technologies than would have seemed possible only five or 10 years ago."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe