Tax credits - the wind in wind energy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For wind power, 2011 was a great year. California added more new wind energy to the grid than any other state, according to a report published Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Energy.

A number of other states received high honors as well. These include Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Oklahoma and Colorado, which churned out at least 500 megawatts of electricity from wind turbines, or enough juice to light up 125,000 homes.

This year could be even better for wind renewables as people rush to "get into the game" while the goings good, and relatively cheap. After that, the winds of change will sweep across the country as many of the federal tax incentives that made renewable energy more alluring expire at the end of 2012.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Which tax incentives are these? Mostly those tucked within the compact wording of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. One provides a "30 precent cash grant from the Treasury in lieu of federal tax credits," reads the report. Many investors jumped at this opportunity, more than 60 percent in fact. Another allows wind power projects to "choose a 30 percent investment tax credit instead of the production tax credit."

All this is to say, it became much easier over the last few years for wind project developers, mostly comprised of independent businesses rather than utilities, to work with investment banks and insurance companies to get their farms up and running. American wind farms now provide about 3 percent of the nation's electricity, and are also frequently built here right on U.S. terra firma. It doesn't approach the pervasive imprint coal, oil, natural gas or nuclear have in producing electricity, but it's a fingerprint at least.

Tax incentives aren't the only boost to thank for this. Not in the least. There have been technical and fiscal improvements in the prices of turbines, installing the farms and the price of the energy itself. Still, without continued support from federal policies, combined with the low price of other energy, mostly natural gas, the gusto with which new wind power projects were erected since 2009 is not predicted to continue spreading like seeds in the wind.

Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

More by Robynne Boyd

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe