Technically speaking 10% of world crude, 32% of natural gas are sitting in shale

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


“Technically recoverable resources” - three words that refer to the amount of crude oil and natural gas that can be extracted from the ground using today’s technologies. No future innovations needed.

The magnitude of this value with respect to shale gas formations was the focus of a major report released last week by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This report revealed their latest assessment of the total “technically recoverable” oil and gas resources found in 137 shale formations across 41 countries. According to their estimate, about 10% of the world’s technically recoverable crude oil (32% of natural gas) currently lies in these shale formations.

[This report is a follow-up to the EIA’s 2011 analysis, which looked at a smaller sample – 69 shale formations within 32 countries – and only focused on natural gas.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Today, only the United States and Canada produce shale oil and gas in significant quantities. But, other nations are currently investigating their own production potential including Australia, China, England, Mexico, and Russia. According to the EIA, Poland has already drilled 43 test wells on prospective shale production sites.

All told, more than half of the oil resources identified in the EIA’s report are found in four countries – Russia, China, Argentina, and Libya. It is a similar story for natural gas – with China, Argentina, Algeria, Canada, and Mexico topping the list. The United States sits in the top 5 on both lists.

Notably missing in this discussion is an analysis of economically recoverable resources as well as assessments of many of the world’s prospective shale formations, including several sites across the Middle East. And, it should be clarified that the report's goal is not to say whether or not these resources should be developed. Just what could be developed. Regardless, this report signifies a step forward in understanding the potential future role of shale in the world’s energy landscape.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe