Technically speaking 10% of world crude, 32% of natural gas are sitting in shale

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


“Technically recoverable resources” - three words that refer to the amount of crude oil and natural gas that can be extracted from the ground using today’s technologies. No future innovations needed.

The magnitude of this value with respect to shale gas formations was the focus of a major report released last week by the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This report revealed their latest assessment of the total “technically recoverable” oil and gas resources found in 137 shale formations across 41 countries. According to their estimate, about 10% of the world’s technically recoverable crude oil (32% of natural gas) currently lies in these shale formations.

[This report is a follow-up to the EIA’s 2011 analysis, which looked at a smaller sample – 69 shale formations within 32 countries – and only focused on natural gas.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Today, only the United States and Canada produce shale oil and gas in significant quantities. But, other nations are currently investigating their own production potential including Australia, China, England, Mexico, and Russia. According to the EIA, Poland has already drilled 43 test wells on prospective shale production sites.

All told, more than half of the oil resources identified in the EIA’s report are found in four countries – Russia, China, Argentina, and Libya. It is a similar story for natural gas – with China, Argentina, Algeria, Canada, and Mexico topping the list. The United States sits in the top 5 on both lists.

Notably missing in this discussion is an analysis of economically recoverable resources as well as assessments of many of the world’s prospective shale formations, including several sites across the Middle East. And, it should be clarified that the report's goal is not to say whether or not these resources should be developed. Just what could be developed. Regardless, this report signifies a step forward in understanding the potential future role of shale in the world’s energy landscape.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe