The impact of low oil prices on state tax revenues

Despite a slight uptick since January, global oil prices are still half of what they were a year ago. These low prices have benefited consumers by dropping the price of gasoline and diesel across the United States.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Despite a slight uptick since January, global oil prices are still half of what they were a year ago. These low prices have benefited consumers by dropping the price of gasoline and diesel across the United States. But, for oil-producing states, these lower oil prices mean decreasing tax revenues that will be difficult to offset through increased production alone.

According to John Krohn and Robert McManmon at the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) the top five oil- and natural gas-producing states - Texas, North Dakota, California, Alaska, and Oklahoma - derive (unsurprisingly) a significant share of their unrestricted operating revenues from taxes on oil and natural gas production. While the sheer size of California's economy has made it relatively less affected by low oil prices, the other four top producers have not been so fortunate.

In particular, Alaska relies on revenue from crude oil production for 90% of its operating budget. In their 2015 revenue projections, the state assumed oil prices at $105 per barrel. Instead, the state is seeing $50-60 per barrel.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By the numbers - according to the EIA:

  • Texas collected $583 million in tax receipts from oil and natural gas production in August 2014, but tax revenue declined by 40% to $352 million in January 2015, based on data from the state's comptroller.

  • North Dakota' s tax revenue from oil and natural gas production decreased from $323 million in August 2014 to $254 million in January 2015, a 21% reduction.

  • Alaska's monthly oil and gas production tax revenue in August 2014 was $108 million according to initial oil and natural gas production tax receipts received by the Alaska Tax Accounting System. In January 2015, revenue from these taxes was $26 million.

  • Oklahoma collected $62 million in funds from production oil and natural gas taxes in August 2014. This value declined to $43 million in January 2015, a drop of roughly 30%, based on information from the Oklahoma Tax Commission.

Noted here in that Texas and North Dakota experienced these significant drops in tax revenue despite increases in crude oil production over the same period of time.

Photo credit:

1. Chart of Marker Crude Oil Prices from the International Energy Agency.

2. Chart of monthly crude oil production in selected states and monthly tax revenue from crude oil and natural gas production in selected states by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe