The U.S. Electric Grid vs. Extreme Weather

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Yesterday, Hurricane Irene weakened to become Tropical Storm Irene – but not before leaving at least 4 million homes without power and causing fuel shortages along the United State’s Atlantic coast. This hurricane brought on-land wind speeds of more than 85 mph in the continental United States, and maintained its hurricane status through most of its trek north. Though the storm had diminished by the time it hit New York today, it still carried 65 mph winds and drenching rain. And, with this wind came downed power lines and poles along the entire east coast, leaving many stranded without power.

The good news is that the east coast knew that this storm was coming. As David Biello said on Thursday – it’s best to be prepared. And, thanks to our nation’s storm tracking abilities, east coast utilities were able to ready road crews so they could repair power lines that were taken down by the high winds. Power plants lying within Irene’s projected path were able to prepare their facilities to be hit by the wind and rain, helping them to avoid extended supply disruptions.

But, even with this preparation, millions of American’s were faced with unplanned power outages – which is no surprise when you look at the size and complexity of the United States electric grid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the first power plants were built in the United States, they were located close to their customers – generally within a few miles. But, over time this distance has increased with growing populations, increasing electricity demand, and the electrification of rural America.

Today, there are more than 160,000 miles of transmission lines (the huge silver towers that you see along the road) and millions of miles of distribution lines running through the United States. While some of these lines run underground - especially in dense urban settings - the majority run overhead, supported by poles and towers. This web of wires moves electricity from the nation’s power plants to our homes and offices, supplying electricity whenever we demand it.

[Note: There is a great U.S. grid visualization tool available on NPR’s website]

Because of today’s connected grid, utilities are able to supply electricity to large areas with fewer power plants. Further, these connections make it easier for operators to balance supply and demand in the case of unexpected outages. But, this grid has also created a lot of expensive infrastructure that is susceptible to damage in extreme weather events.

In 2008, between $500 and $600 million was spent in region surrounding New Orleans, Louisiana after Hurricane Gustav damaged local electrical facilities. Four years earlier, Hurricane Ivan caused power outages from Venezuela to Canada – resulting in another huge price tag. It is reasonable to expect that, out of the $7 billion in estimated damages from Irene, a significant percentage of this total will be spent on bringing power back to the communities hit by the storm.

Photo Credit:

  1. Photo of Hurricane Irene on Friday, 8/26/11 © by NASA Goddard Photo and Video and used under this Creative Commons license.

  2. Photo of the transmission lines on a city street © by CityCaucus.com and used under this Creative Commons license.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe