U.S. Car Manufacturers Surpass Emmissions Standards for 3rd Year in a Row

U.S. fleet-wide fuel economy reaches record high while car manufacturers surpass greenhouse gas emission standards for the 3rd year in a row (VW excluded).

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Car manufacturers in the United States have surpassed greenhouse gas emission standards for the 3rd year in a row, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Fleet-wide fuel economy has also increased by 26% over the past decade to a record high of 24.3 miles per gallon (mpg).

In their reports “The Greenhouse Gas Manufacturer Performance Report” and “Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2015”, the EPA concluded that auto manufacturers exceeded federal emission standards by 13 grams of carbon dioxide (CO2) per mile driven for cars and light trucks (2014 model year) – the equivalent of a 1.4 mpg improvement in fuel economy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On an individual company level, all major U.S. auto manufacturers – except for Kia and Mercedes – outperformed their standards for the 2014 model year. Of note here is that Volkswagon was not included in this analysis because of the on-going investigation (to read more about VW and #DieselGate, see Tali Trigg’s series here, here, here, and here on Plugged In).

The additional savings have been supported by faster adoption rates for fuel-efficient technologies than had been anticipated, says the EPA.  According to Christopher Grundler, the EPA’s Director of the Office of Air Quality and Transportation:

“It’s clear that our [greenhouse gas emission] standards are working, spurring technology and innovation, and we are on track to achieve significant greenhouse gas reductions.”

However, the EPA cautions that, while fuel economy is on the rise, so is the market share for trucks, which get fewer miles to the gallon than cars. All told, truck fuel economy reached a record 20.4 mpg in 2014, which was a 0.6 mpg increase from the previous model year. But, this savings was offset by a 5% increase in truck market share in the same period.

The EPA goes on to say that these greenhouse gas emission standards for cars and light trucks have already prevented 60 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions from being released into the atmosphere.

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe