U.S. on Track to Become World’s Leading Liquid Petroleum Producer

The U.S. is on track to become the world’s leading liquid petroleum producer. According to IEA, domestic production of oil was about 11.5m barrels a day in August, and the Financial Times reports that we are likely to surpass Saudi Arabia’s production for the first time in 23 years.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The U.S. is on track to become the world's leading liquid petroleum producer. According to IEA, domestic production of oil was about 11.5m barrels a day in August, and the Financial Times reports that we are likely to surpass Saudi Arabia's production for the first time in 23 years.

In fact, we may also catch up to Saudi Arabia and Russia on crude production alone by 2020. Perhaps not surprising given production has already risen by over 60 percent during the past six years.

Oh how times have changed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Next year, imports to the U.S. will provide 21 percent of our liquid fuel consumption--remarkable considering imports provided 60 percent of liquid fuel consumption only 10 years ago. And that's good news given world events. Current unrest in the Middle East and Russia's intervention in Ukraine increase uncertainty in markets, so the boom in U.S. production has acted as a stabilizing force.

Crooks and Raval even suggest there may be an impact on global security, especially if lower imports lead to a reduced military commitment to the Middle East. But of course, that would take quite some time to occur. First the American public must get up to speed on the energy transition underway across the nation and around the world. And there's no doubt we have a long way to go...

Sheril Kirshenbaum is executive director of Science Debate, a nonpartisan org working to get presidential candidates on record on science policy. She co-directs Michigan State University's Food Literacy and Engagement Poll and hosts the NPR podcast Serving Up Science.

More by Sheril Kirshenbaum

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe