Used Tires Could Find Second Life in Batteries

Hundreds of millions of tires reach the end of their first life each year in the United States. The majority of these tires are recycled into road paving materials, plastic additives, and other useful materials.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Hundreds of millions of tires reach the end of their first life each year in the United States. The majority of these tires are recycled into road paving materials, plastic additives, and other useful materials. But, a significant waste stream remains, providing an opportunity for new applications for wasted rubber.

This month, the chemistry journal RSC Advances published a paper outlining a process for converting used rubber tires into anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Authored by researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), this paper discusses the process for converting waste tire rubber into nanoporous carbon cakes. According to the authors, these cakes have been used successfully in small laboratory-scale batteries for a hundred charge-discharge cycles.

This method for producing the anode material from used rubber could provide another method for recycling the hundreds of millions of used tires that are produced across the United States each year. However, it will have to prove its competitiveness against other materials in order to achieve commercial success.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Today, the graphite is the anode material-of-choice for lithium ion batteries. However, according to their initial testing results, the ORNL battery has a higher reversible capacity than commercial graphite materials. According to a press release, these properties are due to the unique microstructure of the ORNL tire-derived carbon. In the words of lead researcher, Parans Paranthaman:

This kind of performance is highly encouraging, especially in light of the fact that the global battery market for vehicles and military applications is approaching $78 billion and the materials market is expected to hit $11 billion in 2018.

Furthermore, the carbon material produced in this process could be used in water filtration, gas sorption and storage applications.

Moving forward, ORNL is looking to commercially license this technology (see #ORNL-TT-2014-08), moving it from bench to store shelves for "automobile, stationary storage, medical and military applications."

Photo Credit: Graphic courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe