Vermont’s Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Closes Its Doors

With the close of 2014 came the closing of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant. At 1:04 pm EST on Monday, the 620 Megawatt plant in southern Vermont was completely shut down.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


With the close of 2014 came the closing of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant.

At 1:04 pm EST on Monday, the 620 Megawatt plant in southern Vermont was completely shut down. The nuclear facility had been ramping down slowly for several months. It had been running at 74% capacity on Monday morning, with other New England power stations taking up the growing gap as it drew down its electricity production.

The plant’s closure follows that of of Southern California Edison’s San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Dominion’s Kewaunee plant in Wisconsin, and the Duke Energy’s Crystal River plant in Florida. According to recent analysis by the Energy Information Administration’s Robert McManmon, these facility shutdowns contributed to more than 4,900 job cuts across the country.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The shift has already appeared in the EIA’s tool for tracking the status of the U.S. nuclear fleet. Launched earlier this year, this tool displays daily nuclear power plant capacity data. The Yankee Nuclear Power Plant now shows a daily plant output of 0 percent.

The plant had been in operation for 42 years. According to Vermont’s Governor, Peter Shumlin, the shutdown reflected a distinct shift in Vermont’s energy sector. In a statement yesterday, he stated that “thanks to investments in renewable energy such as solar, Vermont’s energy future is on a different, more sustainable path that is creating jobs, reducing energy costs for Vermonters and slowing climate change.”

The plant is now expected to be decommissioned and dismantled, a process that will likely take decades and cost upwards of $1.2 billion.

Photo Credit: By U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (link) and U.S. Energy Information Administration (link) exists in the public domain.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe