Video: What does NYC's carbon footprint "look" like?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


New York City is well on its way to meeting a citywide goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by 2017. This goal was adopted in 2007 as a part of PlaNYC 2030 to "build a greener, greater New York" and has catalyzed new parkland, housing improvement, and public transportation projects throughout the city. According to updates, the city had already reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by more than 12% compared to the 2005 baseline by the end of 2010.

But, even with this reduction, New York City emitted about 54 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere in 2010. That's just under 2 tons of CO2 per second. Every second. All year long.

Carbon Visuals, in partnership with the Environmental Defense Fund recently published a video that aims to give the viewer a sense of what 2 tons of CO2 per second means. Quite interesting, given that CO2 is a colorless gas, which can make it difficult to visualize.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the video, carbon dioxide is represented using blue spheres that are 33 feet across. This sphere has the volume of 1 ton of CO2, assuming standard temperature (59 deg. F) and atmospheric pressure (1.87 kg per cubic meter).

Interestingly, these carbon dioxide emissions are not primarily the result of the New York City transportation network. (Though, the city's efforts to increase its taxi fleet's fuel economy could certainly have a significant impact on total emissions levels.) It turns out that approximately 75% of NYC's greenhouse gas footprint comes from buildings.

H/T to Jake Whitcomb for sharing this video.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe