Water Recycling Kicks off at New Mexico Laboratory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Each year, the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos National Laboratory’s wastewater treatment plant produces more than a hundred million gallons of treated wastewater effluent. This summer, in an effort to reduce its environmental impact, the laboratory christened a system that will allow it to treat and recycle its wastewater for use in its own cooling towers. This recycling system will allow the facility to reduce its wastewater discharge into the nearby Sandia Canyon, while also decreasing the facility’s potable water consumption by up to 32%.

The Sanitary Effluent Reclamation Facility (SERF-E) project was originally designed to help the laboratory meet Environmental Protection Agency limits on polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB). It uses a four-step process in order to treat the water (as shown below):

  1. precipitation and flocculation (where pollutants are chemically treated so they can be removed from the wastewater)

  2. solids concentration

  3. solids removal and dewatering

  4. reverse osmosis.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to cleaning up the wastewater, the facility will also allow for the reuse of approximately 120 million gallons of sanitary effluent per year. The recycled water will be circulated through the laboratory’s cooling towers to help cool the super-computers housed in the laboratory’s Strategic Computer Complex. The system is designed to be flexible, allowing the facility to continue to discharge some treated wastewater into the nearby Sandia Canyon Wetland in order to protect that area’s environment.

Photo Credit: U.S. Department of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Office of Public Affairs

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe