Who's Most Concerned about Energy Security? The Answer May Surprise You

More than half of Americans express concern over energy security

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


We hear about "energy security" from candidates and talking heads in the media often, but its meaning can be ambiguous because the phrase means different things to different people.

According to the latest UT Energy Poll* released in February, 55 percent of Americans are concerned about it, including 51 percent of Republicans and 65 percent of Democrats.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

This includes 67 percent of Hispanics, 60 percent of African Americans and 52 percent of whites.

Top concerns include terrorist targets (56 percent), dependency on the Middle East for our oil and gas (47 percent), and electric grid vulnerabilities (43 percent).

Those concerned about terrorist targets include 65 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of Democrats.

It will be interesting to see how energy security is addressed by candidates leading up to the 2016 election. It's certainly something I hope we hear more about in the months to come.

* The semiannual University of Texas at Austin Energy Poll polled 2,043 Americans on a wide array of energy issues in January 2016. Data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample's composition reflects the actual U.S. population. For more information on the results, methodology and past surveys, visit www.utenergypoll.com.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe