Who's Most Concerned about Energy Security? The Answer May Surprise You

More than half of Americans express concern over energy security

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


We hear about "energy security" from candidates and talking heads in the media often, but its meaning can be ambiguous because the phrase means different things to different people.

According to the latest UT Energy Poll* released in February, 55 percent of Americans are concerned about it, including 51 percent of Republicans and 65 percent of Democrats.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

This includes 67 percent of Hispanics, 60 percent of African Americans and 52 percent of whites.

Top concerns include terrorist targets (56 percent), dependency on the Middle East for our oil and gas (47 percent), and electric grid vulnerabilities (43 percent).

Those concerned about terrorist targets include 65 percent of Republicans and 50 percent of Democrats.

It will be interesting to see how energy security is addressed by candidates leading up to the 2016 election. It's certainly something I hope we hear more about in the months to come.

* The semiannual University of Texas at Austin Energy Poll polled 2,043 Americans on a wide array of energy issues in January 2016. Data were weighted using U.S. Census Bureau figures, as well as propensity scores, to ensure the sample's composition reflects the actual U.S. population. For more information on the results, methodology and past surveys, visit www.utenergypoll.com.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe