Why Can’t Companies Get Renewables?

If two-thirds of Fortune 100 companies want to buy electricity generated by off-site renewable energy sources this year, why hasn't more capacity been built?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If two-thirds of Fortune 100 companies want to buy electricity generated by off-site renewable energy sources this year, why hasn’t more capacity been built?

According to the Colorado-based Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), the heart of the problem lies with the logistical complexities associated with large-scale renewable energy systems. In turn, large companies often give up on renewable energy and dedicate their time to other projects.

As a result, the Colorado based think-and-do tank has launched a new platform that they hope will remove barriers to renewable energy adoption by large corporations. Dubbed the “Business Renewables Center,” this platform was created with the goal of removing barriers to renewable energy adoption by large corporations in order to bring an additional 60 GW of wind and solar by 2025. If successful, these additions would will nearly double the current total installed U.S. capacity.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Corporations can be a powerful lever for expanding renewable energy in the United States and beyond. They can lock in long-term affordable prices for clean energy that supports the bottom line, reduce their carbon footprint, and fulfill their corporate sustainability commitments,” said RMI Managing Director Hervé Touati in RMI’s launch of the new Center.

As of its launch on Monday, the BRC platform had enlisted more than 25 founding members, including Bloomberg, eBay, and GM. All told, these member corporations represent over 24 TWh in electricity consumption per year, more than 6 times the amount used in the United States each year.

On the project side, RMI has brought together developers including FirstSolar, NRG Energy, SunEdison, and the E.ON-Climate and Renewables North America group and transaction service providers including Altenex, Renewable Choice Energy, Renewable Power Direct and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

The Centre marks the second large partnership announcement made by RMI this winter. In December, the think tank announced its partnership with Sir Richard Branson’s Carbon War Room (CWR).

Photo Credit: Photo of wind turbine by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe