Why Can’t Companies Get Renewables?

If two-thirds of Fortune 100 companies want to buy electricity generated by off-site renewable energy sources this year, why hasn't more capacity been built?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If two-thirds of Fortune 100 companies want to buy electricity generated by off-site renewable energy sources this year, why hasn’t more capacity been built?

According to the Colorado-based Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), the heart of the problem lies with the logistical complexities associated with large-scale renewable energy systems. In turn, large companies often give up on renewable energy and dedicate their time to other projects.

As a result, the Colorado based think-and-do tank has launched a new platform that they hope will remove barriers to renewable energy adoption by large corporations. Dubbed the “Business Renewables Center,” this platform was created with the goal of removing barriers to renewable energy adoption by large corporations in order to bring an additional 60 GW of wind and solar by 2025. If successful, these additions would will nearly double the current total installed U.S. capacity.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Corporations can be a powerful lever for expanding renewable energy in the United States and beyond. They can lock in long-term affordable prices for clean energy that supports the bottom line, reduce their carbon footprint, and fulfill their corporate sustainability commitments,” said RMI Managing Director Hervé Touati in RMI’s launch of the new Center.

As of its launch on Monday, the BRC platform had enlisted more than 25 founding members, including Bloomberg, eBay, and GM. All told, these member corporations represent over 24 TWh in electricity consumption per year, more than 6 times the amount used in the United States each year.

On the project side, RMI has brought together developers including FirstSolar, NRG Energy, SunEdison, and the E.ON-Climate and Renewables North America group and transaction service providers including Altenex, Renewable Choice Energy, Renewable Power Direct and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

The Centre marks the second large partnership announcement made by RMI this winter. In December, the think tank announced its partnership with Sir Richard Branson’s Carbon War Room (CWR).

Photo Credit: Photo of wind turbine by the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe