Ferroputty and Rare Earth Magnet Interaction Delights Thousands!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I love when I find a nerdy or scientific gif I can share on social media, because these capture people's attention right away and share a message or sentiment in a compact form that amuses, fascinates and delights! Facebook does not support the playing of gifs and twitter does not show images immediately, but Google Plus allows the sharing of active gifs and this is where I find the most immediate response from the audience. These gifs go viral once enough +1s, shares, and comments accumulate after which the images will be found on the "What's Hot" list and then the numbers grow rapidly once there.

Here is one I found quite amusing. It's been around since the summer of 2011, but if you'd never seen it before, it is fresh and fun, especially if you are a fan of the original Star Trek Series:

There is some psychology here that makes me want to watch to see who finally wins, even though I know it is merely a continuous loop!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The other day, during a break at a special gathering of some of the top thinkers in education and education technology the internet has to offer, hosted by Discovery Education (the education arm of the Discovery Channel) at their campus in Silver Spring, MD, I came across a fascinating gif on Google Plus, originally posted by Panah Rad, which was created from this original video and shared it with my audience.

This gif shows a rare earth neodymium magnet being consumed by a putty full of iron particles (a thick ferrofluid of sorts) and is a bit deceptive in that the time it takes for consumption, which looks rapid here, is actually a timelapse of a process that took nearly 90 minutes! This image quickly went to the What's Hot list and as of yesterday, had over 2500 +1s and over 1200 shares.

I've been asked "Where can I get this stuff?!" many times. It can be found at Amazon and also at Vat19. Vat19 have created a great video of what these objects can do together!

Follow me on Google Plus if you enjoy these sorts of gifs and, once there, feel free to ask me about great circles to share to satisfy your need for science!

Joanne Manaster is a university level cell and molecular biology lecturer with an insatiable passion for science outreach to all ages. Enjoy her quirky videos at www.joannelovesscience.com, on twitter @sciencegoddess and on her Facebook page at JoanneLovesScience

More by Joanne Manaster

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe