Glittering Nobel Gown Represents Scientist's Work

Women in the public eye are constantly scrutinized for what they wear, whether it be a politician, a Hollywood starlet or even a scientist at the Nobel Prize ceremony.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Women in the public eye are constantly scrutinized for what they wear, whether it be a politician, a Hollywood starlet or even a scientist at the Nobel Prize ceremony. The male Nobel Prize recipients have it relatively easy, at least wardrobe-wise. They put on their tie and tails and they are good to go, but women have a few more decisions to make regarding color, style, accessories, appropriateness for the venue and so forth.

For this year's Nobel Prize Award Ceremony, UK engineer-turned-fashion designer, Matthew Hubble saw an opportunity to blend fashion and science via May Britt Moser's receiving the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine this year along with her husband, Edvard Moser, and colleague John O'Keefe for their work on grid neurons. Matthew's background as an engineer, along with his daughter currently studying neuroscience, resulted in him considering a way to elegantly represent the neuroscientists' work through fashion. He settled on creating a sophisticated gown that featured the neuron grid through piecing of navy viscose satin joined by silver leather in such a way that it fit the body comfortably and flatteringly. The gown is beautifully accented with beading in the shape of three large neurons complete with the soma (the body that contains the nucleus) and nerve fibers. The way the beading catches the light gives the illusion of electricity coursing through the axons and dendrites, reaching the synapses in order to communicate with each other.

I sat down to speak with Matthew and put together a video of our conversation. I was hoping to use Google Hangouts on Air (my favorite way to interview people for a natural flow of conversation), but due to technical issues, settled on us using Photo Booth and editing the separate clips together. We spoke for nearly 30 minutes and here is a five minute summary where Matthew tells us about creating the dress and the place of fashion in communicating science, the relative dearth of women Nobel science prize winners, and what May Britt thought about the significance of the dress:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


http://youtu.be/bwnDv9Em5cM

May Britt gave a quote to journalists who were at the final fitting of the gown:

“A good designer has a lot in common with a good researcher. Both hunt for excellence and perfection. And you have to really focus on the details, and you don’t really know what the final result will be before you have it.”

The Nobel Awards Ceremony livestreamed today at 12:50 CET. Check out the video to see the dress debut!

I'm sure that Edvard and John wish they had matching pocket squares! :)

Joanne Manaster is a university level cell and molecular biology lecturer with an insatiable passion for science outreach to all ages. Enjoy her quirky videos at www.joannelovesscience.com, on twitter @sciencegoddess and on her Facebook page at JoanneLovesScience

More by Joanne Manaster

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe